Paul Krugman Defines a Hillary Clinton Win

krugman

An article by Paul Krugman in the New York Times mirrored what I have been saying for many months. He has a credibility I do not possess, but maybe, just maybe, I pay more attention to the facts than most of the major media, and political pundits who fail to see reality.

Krugman points to the fact that although the mainstream media attempted to hold Hillary to a higher standard by consistently insinuating that she lied about her e-mails, the Clinton Foundation, and any other obscure “scandal,” she easily won the Democratic nomination. Absolutely no proof has been offered of her wrong doing.

I have revealed the truth for a very long time. The attacks against Hillary are unfounded. She made honest mistakes while serving our nation’s people. At the same time, her opponent was committing criminal actions, and defrauding his business associates.

Krugman also asks the same questions I have asked for more than a year. Why were 16 other candidates, several of which had limited qualifications to become our president, while Trump had none, unable to defeat the “orange man?” Krugman is not afraid to agree with me that Trump supporters are racists and bigots who have found a voice; a leader.

He also agrees with me that there just might exist the possibility that Hillary is an extremely qualified candidate. A simple examination of her experience proves that she is the most qualified candidate in our nation’s history.

Krugman also stated some Republican illusions. Does anyone who knows anything about our nation’s tax structure and its economy continue to believe that tax cuts for the wealthy create job growth? Beginning with Ronald Reagan in 1981, “trickle-down,” or “supply side” economics have failed our nation. The most recent proof is the George W. Bush Administration which left our nation in trillions of dollars in debt although he had inherited a surplus from Democratic President Bill Clinton. Unemployment rates rose to a ceiling not experienced since Reagan’s second term.

Krugman and I agree that Hillary became most impressive during the “debates.” Trump attempted to turn the events into a recurrence of of the faux-Republican debates when he manipulated the commentators and devastated his rivals who lacked the talent to defeat him. She shined, as I expected, while Trump began to implode.

The final stake in his heart was his foolhardy speech at the Al Smith Foundation dinner. He attempted to redirect a light-heated roast into an attack on his opponent.

This event, which only added to his difficulty with multiple women who have described him as a sexual predator, ended his campaign.

Paul Krugman claims that Hillary will win in 16 days. I agree. If we are both wrong; our nation is in serious danger of extinction.

Please save our nation for the majority and re-post. Thank you.

Op-Ed

By James Turnage

Source

Photo Courtesy of Commonwealth Central

Follow me on twitter; @jamesturnagenov

Read my novels on the free Amazon Kindle app worldwide

Leave a comment